![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
timpeltjeThat's what my TV told me when MALIKA, a 27-year-old stock photo, was shown to me, adding that she wanted to make a man's wildest dreams cum true - age didn't really matter.
1€ per sent/received SMS.
Now Becky is telling me she's been single for four years and all she wants is unlimited sex. Poor Becky, it must be hard to know you don't really exist, but your libido hasn't really caught up with you.
I am so puzzled why ANYONE would text a fictitious profile. To translate that disclaimer: "some random computer will reply to your message and you will pay for this computer answer. The message will be of sexual nature, because that is what you desire, you lonely, sad fuck."
Isn't this the perfect get-rich-quick scheme? If this is on TV, it must mean there is money to be made. Doesn't look like it's that expensive to get some stock photos and add some sexy profiles for them. *timmy calling out to Erik:* "Baby, we got ourselves a money-making scheme!"
Are men really this stupid, I wonder?
Some time later, these three ugly bitches showed up on screen (I have to admit: I kept the soundless channel in the background because the swift colour changes made me feel less lonesome):
They are there for me at €1,50 a minute. Now, I'm not a math expert, nor am I an expert in prostitutionism (copyright on that term, use it and get sued!), but just 67 metres (thanks, Google!) away from me, hundreds of actual prostitutes are readily available to make one "sneeze milk out of one's wiener" (to quote Butters from South Park) and this at much-much lower prices I am told by their visitors at the bakery where I buy my daily bread.
Now I am the first one to admit that a horny mind and rational arguments don't mix, but why would I want to call someone moaning and regurgitating vowels into a telephone while I have to do all the work, when I could have someone doing it all for me?
Maybe I'm not getting all the phone sex business. I guess I'm old-fashioned that I want my sexual partner (Erik!) to be in the same room as me. When I was in Berlin last year, I remember playfully attempting phone or even webcam sex, but we both agreed it was horrible. While on the phone, I would say: "What are you wearing" to which he would reply: "Slacks and some random black shirt?" to which I would reply, not giving up my futile attempt: "mmm, and what are you doingggg?" to which he would reply: "I just fed the cat (*cat meowing in the background*) and then I'm going to the supermarket". I did reply something like "mmm, that's so hot!" but of course I didn't mean it.
Now of those three ugly women, the one on the right has mysteriously disappeared. I would like to think she had to study for her MA degree in philosophy, though I fear she is just doing it to get drug money.
To think they are all someone's little girl... Still, for all we know they are fictitious too... This is what PIXAR do to make real money! Truly horrible films like Toy Story 3 & Cars (1 & 2) make them lose so much money, that the only way to make up for it, is to come up with these fictional renderings of ugly females (ugly to add to the realism!) and try to sell them to the dumb 25% of the population. And that is why we are going to see a Toy Story 4.
1€ per sent/received SMS.
Now Becky is telling me she's been single for four years and all she wants is unlimited sex. Poor Becky, it must be hard to know you don't really exist, but your libido hasn't really caught up with you.
I am so puzzled why ANYONE would text a fictitious profile. To translate that disclaimer: "some random computer will reply to your message and you will pay for this computer answer. The message will be of sexual nature, because that is what you desire, you lonely, sad fuck."
Isn't this the perfect get-rich-quick scheme? If this is on TV, it must mean there is money to be made. Doesn't look like it's that expensive to get some stock photos and add some sexy profiles for them. *timmy calling out to Erik:* "Baby, we got ourselves a money-making scheme!"
Are men really this stupid, I wonder?
Some time later, these three ugly bitches showed up on screen (I have to admit: I kept the soundless channel in the background because the swift colour changes made me feel less lonesome):
They are there for me at €1,50 a minute. Now, I'm not a math expert, nor am I an expert in prostitutionism (copyright on that term, use it and get sued!), but just 67 metres (thanks, Google!) away from me, hundreds of actual prostitutes are readily available to make one "sneeze milk out of one's wiener" (to quote Butters from South Park) and this at much-much lower prices I am told by their visitors at the bakery where I buy my daily bread.
Now I am the first one to admit that a horny mind and rational arguments don't mix, but why would I want to call someone moaning and regurgitating vowels into a telephone while I have to do all the work, when I could have someone doing it all for me?
Maybe I'm not getting all the phone sex business. I guess I'm old-fashioned that I want my sexual partner (Erik!) to be in the same room as me. When I was in Berlin last year, I remember playfully attempting phone or even webcam sex, but we both agreed it was horrible. While on the phone, I would say: "What are you wearing" to which he would reply: "Slacks and some random black shirt?" to which I would reply, not giving up my futile attempt: "mmm, and what are you doingggg?" to which he would reply: "I just fed the cat (*cat meowing in the background*) and then I'm going to the supermarket". I did reply something like "mmm, that's so hot!" but of course I didn't mean it.
Now of those three ugly women, the one on the right has mysteriously disappeared. I would like to think she had to study for her MA degree in philosophy, though I fear she is just doing it to get drug money.
To think they are all someone's little girl... Still, for all we know they are fictitious too... This is what PIXAR do to make real money! Truly horrible films like Toy Story 3 & Cars (1 & 2) make them lose so much money, that the only way to make up for it, is to come up with these fictional renderings of ugly females (ugly to add to the realism!) and try to sell them to the dumb 25% of the population. And that is why we are going to see a Toy Story 4.
